Volunteer Racism?

In the March 1, 1900 (page 66, Reprints page 2585) issue of the Watch Tower, the following announcement was made:

RE-ENLISTED VOLUNTEERS! TO ARMS!

----------

The new lot of "Bible vs. Evolution" ammunition is not yet ready, but by March 15 to April 1 we will have plenty of the new ammunition for use where the Bible vs. Evolution has already been distributed. You will like it, we assure you this in advance. It will consist of "Which is the True Gospel?" and "What Say the Scriptures about Hell?" in the shape of a double number of the WATCH TOWER. Get your several squads together and let us have your orders stating (1) the number of white Protestant churches in the district; (2) the average attendance at service which the church members chiefly attend; (3) the number of Volunteers in your squad; (4) to what address would you prefer to have the ammunition sent.

A follow-up article regarding the above notice appeared in the April 15, 1900 issue of the Watch Tower. Some are quoting this article in order to make it appear that Russell was a racist.  One web page quotes the following:

“Reading matter distributed to a colored congregation would more than half of it be utterly wasted, and a very small percentage indeed likely to yield good results”. - The Watchtower of April 15, 1900 p. 122

Exactly what is considered to be racist in the above statement is not stated; in reality what Russell stated simply presents the fact of the matter as it was when he made the statement. Indeed, very few black people were educated in the days of Russell, so it would not have been wise to waste money and time by giving them something that they could not read.

A video on YouTube quotes more of what Russell stated, again with the desire to present Russell as a racist; we present below what is quoted in the video:

There are probably as many as a hundred colored brethren on the Watch Tower lists, some of them very clear in the truth, and very earnest in its service, financially and otherwise. We have received letters from several of these, who had intended engaging in the Volunteer work, expressing surprise that in the call for Volunteers in the March 1st issue we restricted the inquiry to white Protestant churches. They rightly realized that we have not the slightest of race prejudice, and that we love the colored brethren with just the same warmth of heart that we love the white, and they queried therefore why such a distinction should be made in the call. The reason is that so far as we are able to judge, colored people have less education than whites--many of them quite insufficient to permit them to profit by such reading as we have to give forth. Our conclusion therefore is based upon the supposition that reading matter distributed to a colored congregation would more than half of it be utterly wasted, and a very small percentage indeed likely to yield good results.

Again, Russell was simply presenting the true facts as they existed in his day; it was simply a fact that very few of the blacks in his day could read, and thus any reading material given to them would have been of no benefit to them, and would, in effect, have reflected a waste of money and time. Some, however, in effect deny this fact of history, and claim that Brother Russell was simply presenting a false "stereotype" of black people. Such would seem to want their readers to judge Russell by the present situation of black people, and not by what was the actuality that existed in the days of Russell. Nevertheless, Russell was not prohibiting the witnessing to any of the black the people, nor was prohibiting volunteers or colporteurs from distributing literature to any of the black people who could read. What was being discussed was presenting literature at black churches when the majority of the congregation in those churches could not read.

Another states that blacks were not allowed to participate in the "pioneer work". In reality that which is called "pioneer" work by the Jehovah's Witnesses did not exist in the days of Russell. Some claim that the colporteur work was the same as the pioneer work, but, as far we have been able to determine, blacks were not barred from participating in the colporteur work, although it may have been that there were no blacks who had applied for the colporteur work at that time. However, concerning the volunteer work, Brother Russell stated: "The Volunteer service is open to all of the Lord's dear people, brethren and sisters, white and colored." (Watch Tower, April 15, 1900, page 122) We have no reason to think that the same policy was not applied to the Colporteur service. So far we have seen no one present any evidence that blacks were not permitted to be colporteurs. At any rate, it appears that the idea that Russell did not allow black people be colporteurs is a either a misunderstanding or simply assumed to have been a fact, when it is not.

It is being claimed that Russell had a "whites-only policy concerning volunteers." This is not worded in harmony with the facts, and is very misleading, to say the least. Some have evidently thought that this means that Russell had barred any witnessing to the blacks, which is simply not true. In the same article that is being quoted above, Russell stated:

We advise, therefore, that where the Watch Tower literature is introduced to colored people it be not by promiscuous circulation, but only to those who give evidence of some ear for the truth....The Volunteer service is open to all of the Lord's dear people, brethren and sisters, white and colored, who have a desire thus to serve the great Captain of our salvation, and to help deliver their "brethren" from the bondage of Babylon into the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free from sectarianism, superstition and every yoke of bondage. Nor do we desire to place this service as a yoke or burden upon any, but as the word indicates, it is only for "Volunteers." We believe that the Lord would not have any conscriptions or drafts connected with his service. As to whether or not this is a way in which you can serve the Lord's cause is not for us but for you to decide. We merely give you our opinion, that this is one of the best means of serving the truth--preaching the Gospel of the Kingdom--breaking the chains of error that are upon the "brethren"--honoring the name and character of our heavenly Father, and extolling the great redemption accomplished by Jesus our Saviour. It is a "harvest" work, in that it is gathering to the Lord his true people,--gathering them out of the various sects--not into another sect, but into heart-union with the Lord and with all who are at-one with him through oneness of spirit, engendered by love of the truth.

Some, ignorant of what Russell taught on the atonement. Many therefore, think Russell was preaching the same message that the Jehovah's Witnesses present concerning Armageddon. Russell, however, was not presenting a message that says, in effect, "Join us or be eternally destroyed in Armageddon." Many, however, who think that he did would certainly think ill of  Russell for condemning blacks to such eternal destruction because they could not read. The truth is, however, that Russell did not believe in such a message that is now taught by the Jehovah's Witnesses. The main message that Russell preached was almost the opposite of the message now preached by the Jehovah's Witnesses. Therefore, the fact that these blacks, or any others, could not read, or that they were being skipped in receiving tracts in the general the volunteer work, did not then and still does not mean that such will be eternally destroyed in Armageddon. They are still included in Christ's ransom sacrifice and will receive the blessings of  man's new judgment day. They they will -- in the millennial age -- be taught Jehovah's ways, and will be able to understand what they could not understand in this age. 

For more information:

Studies Related to Armageddon and the Ransom

Russell and Racism