tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2900409752866427375.post1364737361095675811..comments2023-11-13T23:03:52.942-05:00Comments on Charles Taze Russell - Examining the Facts: Did CT Russell Claim That The Christian God is the Devil? (moved)Ronald Dayhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01428695352830083280noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2900409752866427375.post-56888940996602455612012-08-10T16:34:18.950-04:002012-08-10T16:34:18.950-04:00Charles Taze Russell can certainly not be held res...Charles Taze Russell can certainly not be held responsible for the JWs' prohibition of blood transfusions. He never wrote about blood transfusion at all. For what Russell did write concerning eating of blood, and my conclusions regarding blood transfustion, see:<br /><a href="http://jws.reslight.net/?p=24" rel="nofollow">Blood Transfusions and the Bible</a>Ronald Dayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01428695352830083280noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2900409752866427375.post-31673168332353316562012-08-10T16:32:21.851-04:002012-08-10T16:32:21.851-04:00This comment has been removed by the author.Ronald Dayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01428695352830083280noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2900409752866427375.post-64315683293155434832012-08-10T16:26:03.554-04:002012-08-10T16:26:03.554-04:00Russell, around 1872, came to realize that Jesus w...Russell, around 1872, came to realize that Jesus would not return in the flesh, thus Russell was not like those who were claiming to be Christ in the flesh, that he could found in here or there. Nor did Russell believe that God's Kingdom was to be recognized here or there in the flesh as the JWs claim for their organization.<br /><br />In 1876, Russell, who already had come to the conclusion Ronald Dayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01428695352830083280noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2900409752866427375.post-47049698240370888672012-08-10T13:48:35.211-04:002012-08-10T13:48:35.211-04:00I think that perhaps Danny Haszard has commented w...I think that perhaps Danny Haszard has commented with the false impression that this site supports the Jehovah's Witnesses. We do not. Charles Taze Russell was never a member of the Jehovah's Witnesses, and the points given are lost as far as Russell is concerned.<br /><br />On the other hand, we agree with much is stated; the message that the JWs preach, in many respects, is almost the Ronald Dayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01428695352830083280noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2900409752866427375.post-90433867784041065792012-08-10T03:06:49.842-04:002012-08-10T03:06:49.842-04:00Jehovahs Witnesses who are they?
A) They are at yo...Jehovahs Witnesses who are they?<br />A) They are at your door to recruit you for their watchtower society corporation,they will say that *we are just here to share a message from the Bible*... this is deception right off.<br />B) Their *message* creed is a false Gospel that Jesus had his second coming in 1914.The problem with this is it's not just a cute fairy tale,Jesus warned of the false Danny Haszardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14261799967881410663noreply@blogger.com